12/27/2023 0 Comments Contract wars hack or hacking![]() And that probably happened when the business started being bounced from one mega-corp to another. I expect the National Geographic, as many of us remember it, likely died long ago. People don't want to be preached or lectured to about your values, or why they're the worst, most undeserving living 'things' on this planet. These are literally the headline articles for just this month!? This is how you lose your readers. Now? 'Elephants are in trouble and we're to blame.' 'These Native Americans were taken rom their families as children' 'Kosovo wants to decide its future - but will history hold it back?' 'This scientist analyzes African American's past to inform the present.' 'This ordinary woman hid Anne Frank.' And of course a super-sized serving of focus on typical concerns such as global warming. ![]() Or give interesting and fun cultural insights across the Iron Curtain of the "enemy" during the Cold War, without at all getting involved in the political dehumanization games of the past (and especially the present). For instance it was able to inspire awe about the progress being made during the space race, while sidestepping the fact it was also driving mass militarization. I wasn't: National Geographic was always an overtly anti-political magazine. I actually had to check the Wiki to make sure I wasn't have some sort of false memory. If you can barely afford to fund your editors, photographers, and more - where exactly should DEI rank on your list of concerns, let alone expenditures?Ģ) Changes in themes tend to push people away from businesses. How much does a full time of editors, photographers, reporters, and more actually cost? With many failing industries it increasingly feels like the burden is not coming from operational costs themselves, but from these enormous administrative layers which essentially just drown businesses, yet are the last to see major cuts. Each subscription cost around $40, so you're looking at $70 million+ in revenue, from the magazine alone. And don't call me old or jaded, I'm barely 30, I already grew up with ancient aliens on the 'history' channel.Īt least from my perspective, it feels at least plausibly linked for two reasons.ġ) They had 1.8 million subscribers when deciding to shut down. Reminds me of the tidbit that Astronaut used to be the most named profession teens aspired to in the 70s and 80s. Tunas” at odds with the society’s original high-minded vision." While they produced documentaries equal in quality to the magazine’s rigorous reporting, the channels - managed by Rupert Murdoch’s 21st Century Fox - also aired pseudoscientific entertainment programming about UFOs and reality series like “Sharks vs. The magazine was eventually surpassed for profits and attention by the society’s video operations, including its flagship National Geographic cable channel and Nat Geo Wild, a channel focused on animals. Many of its devotees so savored its illumination of other worlds - space, the depths of the ocean, little-seen parts of the planet - that they stacked old issues into piles that cluttered attics and basements. " At its peak in the late 1980s, National Geographic reached 12 million subscribers in the United States, and millions more overseas. If they don't employ writers, then who is going to be writing the magazine? > National Geographic spokesperson Chris Albert said staffing changes will not affect the company’s plans to continue publishing a monthly magazine ![]() ![]() They seriously can't find the miniscule amount of cash in there to support National Geographic's journalism? Walt Disney is one of the most evil and exploitative companies ever, so I suppose I'm not surprised by their actions here. It's sad that National Geographic is effectively closing its doors when it's owned by Walt Disney Co., which has yearly revenue of nearly $100 billion. > The cutback - the latest in a series under owner Walt Disney Co. The Internet and capitalism don't make a good cocktail. So everyone ends up getting "free" information and articles that consist of drivel and superficial research all the while paying for it via their data being collected and sold. It is really sad that actual journalism has no place in today's world because the Internet has made everyone want everything for free. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |